Bobby Hemmitt says a lot about deep, wise, intelligent and “crazy” things. Bobby Hemmitt is a scholar of esoteric knowledge. He has been captivating audiences for the past 20 years with a dynamic brand of exploratory scholarship and an energetic public delivery that involves a tremendous amount of research that he always and I repeat always gives to you within the presentation. If you think he’s talking out of the side of his neck you can call him out but you better check his sources first. His research is impeccable. His philosophy is based in knowing that all the things labelled pagan, occult, and mysterious are the knowledge and wisdom of the cultures of the world that were living in harmony with all life prior to the rise of our current European centered civilization. The rational, christian, scientific belief systems are a paradigm that limits our ability to access the unity of oneness with all existence. Bobby delves into what we call metaphysics, rituals, science, occult, voodoo, astronomy, Gnostic wisdom, mysticism, kemetic wisdom, UFO’s, magic of all forms, Greek mythology, and some so-called “downright satanic shit.” Blending them all into one and giving an insightful analysis of current events that is just awesome to witness.
Category: Knowledge or Debunk (for educational and research purposes)
knowledge (n.)
early 12c., cnawlece “acknowledgment of a superior, honor, worship;” for first element see know (v.). The second element is obscure, perhaps from Scandinavian and cognate with the -lock “action, process,” found in wedlock.
From late 14c. as “capacity for knowing, understanding; familiarity;” also “fact or condition of knowing, awareness of a fact;” also “news, notice, information; learning; organized body of facts or teachings.” Sense of “sexual intercourse” is from c. 1400. Middle English also had a verb form, knoulechen “acknowledge” (c. 1200), later “find out about; recognize,” and “to have sexual intercourse with” (c. 1300); compare acknowledge.
debunk (v.)
“expose false or nonsensical claims or sentiments,” 1923, from de- + bunk (n.2); apparently first used by U.S. novelist William Woodward (1874-1950), in his best-seller “Bunk;” the notion being “to take the bunk out of things.” It got a boost from Harold U. Faulkner’s “Colonial History Debunked” [Harper’s Magazine, December 1925], which article itself quickly was debunked, and the word was in vogue in America in the mid-1920s. Related: Debunked; debunking. Wets and Drys, Fundamentalists and Modernists, are busily engaged in debunking one another to the delight and edification of a public which divides its time between automobiling and listening-in. Is it art, or education, or religion that you prefer? You have only to get the right station and what you last heard about the matter will be cleverly debunked while you wait. [Carl Vernon Tower, “Genealogy ‘Debunked'”, in “Annual Reports of the Tower Genealogical Society,” 1925] It was, naturally, execrated in England. The origin of to debunk is doubtless the same as that of American jargon in general — the inability of an ill-educated and unintelligent democracy to assimilate long words. Its intrusion in our own tongue is due partly to the odious novelty of the word itself, and partly to the prevailing fear that to write exact English nowadays is to be put down as a pedant and a prig. [letter to the editor, London Daily Telegraph, March 2, 1935, cited in Mencken, “The American Language”]